|
Comment:
Whilst I write this a few days
after the Virgin rail crash, it is too early to
comment on how they will fare as a business in the
aftermath. Early indicators, despite a slow response
(no statement on their web site for some hours after
the incident) are looking positive. Their chairman,
the high profile Sir Richard Branson, immediately
travelled to the scene and visited local hospitals.
He was visibly shaken and demonstrated a caring
and compassionate side to his company. In addition,
Sir Richard has a huge amount of “goodwill” in his
PR bank account.
Our lead article this month, written by our Crisis
Management head, Andy Jarosz, covers another recent
crisis in the US, for booming airline JetBlue. Whilst
delays caused by ice storms injured no one, the
inconvenience for thousands was huge. Again, by
doing all the right things, they are limiting the
damage to their brand and reputation.
How
to get it right - an example of great crisis management.
Imagine
you are the Chief Executive of a large company.
A major incident involving your product or service
has dramatically affected your customers, resulting
in massive inconvenience, serious injuries or worse.
What is your first reaction? What is the first message
you give out through the media?
Chances are, for most of us one of the first considerations
would be to find out what went wrong: Who was to
blame? Was our company responsible? We would want
the world to know that we would do everything we
could to find out who, or what, was responsible
(and hope it wasn’t us).
Now put yourself as the victim of that same incident.
You are injured, or have been greatly inconvenienced,
by an unexpected turn of events while using a particular
service or product. What would be your initial concerns?
What would you expect from the leader of that organisation?
For most people they initial expectations will
be for the company involved to show that they care,
that their primary concern is the safety and welfare
of their customers, and that they will do their
utmost to look after the immediate physical and
emotional needs of the people caught up in the drama.
Of course an investigation needs to take place into
each major incident. But for the customers of that
company (and by automatic extension the future customers,
shareholders and many other stakeholders) the first
public appearance from the senior management must
show caring and compassion for those involved and
a personal appreciation of the human aspects of
the drama. The time for finding scapegoats or making
denials is not in the immediate aftermath of an
incident. Humility and arrogance are often seen
in their extreme forms in such a scenario and are
remembered and attached to that company long after
the incident has occurred.
Consider the case of Jet Blue recently,
whose flight operations fell into chaos when bad
weather in the north-east US caused a string of
late cancellations for their customers. The CEO
David Neelman took a very public stance in saying
that he was “humiliated and mortified” at the
events. This even went as far as posting his statement
on youtube.com. More details of the story from
the NewYork Times can be found by clicking here.
Mr. Neelman has received much praise for his stance,
and although time will tell how much his company
changes as a result of his promises, he has grasped
the need to identify emotionally with his customers.
By feeling their anger and pain, he has made bold
announcements of how his company will improve that
would mirror or even exceed the likely demands that
would have come from disgruntled customers and lobby
groups.
> Back
to top
Trauma support during the recovery period.
A Virgin Pendolino train was
derailed on Friday evening resulting in one death
and more than 20 people physically injured. Emergency
services have said that it was a miracle that there
weren’t more fatalities given the scale of the incident.
Jo Crofts, Head of Trauma Support at docleaf, explains
that “the immediate priority will always be to ensure
that those physically injured receive the medical
help they need. My question is how many of the people
involved in this incident will receive the emotional
and psychological help they may need?”
While there is increasing acknowledgement of the
need for psychological interventions after such
incidents, the actual translation into action is
far from adequate. Providing these people with the
appropriate support needs to become the norm and
not, as is in many cases presently, the exception.
Man-made disasters such as transport crashes have
been shown to have a greater psychological impact
on the both the survivors and the bereaved. Risk
of adverse psychological outcomes will be heightened
if the incident is sudden, unexpected or as a result
of perceived negligence.
Appropriate psychological interventions to deal
with the post-trauma period are critical if the
psychological adjustments are to be made in the
long term.
In the weeks and months following an incident the
extent of risk and potential psychological impact
related to the incident will begin to appear. It
is critical that these signs are treated as early
as possible in order that they do not become chronic.
Preventive interventions should be targeted at those
individuals who have been identified as high risk.
Most survivors will not seek psychological support
on their own account so there is a need for policy
and planning to ensure these people do not fall
through the net, and receive the help and support
they need.
Studies show that post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) and major depressive disorders are the two
most prevalent psychological effects following a
major incident; however only 25% of people impacted
will seek appropriate support.
So how are you protecting your people?
> Back
to top
docleaf
forms the largest global network of crisis communications
specialists.
Not a day passes when a crisis
does not hit a company or organisation somewhere
in the world. It might be anything from an outbreak
of food poisoning in a hotel, or the crash of a
holiday coach to a fatality on a building site,
a product recall or an environmental issue.
In this Internet world the media, human and commercial
impact of such incidents has no geographic boundaries
– a combination of effective planning plus expert
resources on the ground are the two most effective
tools needed to manage a crisis when it strikes.
To meet this challenge docleaf has formed one of
the largest international networks of crisis communications
specialists. It currently covers eight countries
– Australia, Canada, Dubai, Greece, India, Singapore,
South Africa and United States and active discussions
with other specialist firms in Asia and Europe are
in progress to expand the network’s geographic reach
during 2007.
For further information about the
docleaf International Network read the full press
release here
or email david.davis@docleaf.com
> Back
to top
Articles are copyrighted to docleaf®.
Permission to reprint will usually be granted for
no charge. Write to info@docleaf.com.
The articles represent the opinions of the authors
and all information is provided "as is"
without warranty of any kind. A
collection of past eNews articles can be found at
www.docleaf.com/news/enews.php
Best wishes and keep
safe, Dr. David Perl, CEO
- docleaf
Visit our website at www.docleaf.com
Unsubscribe from this newsletter here
. If you have any difficulties in unsubscribing
then please call one of my team on:
+44 (0) 1923 681224 and ask them to take you off
our mailing list. |